Endothelial Microparticles: Markers of Inflammatory Response After Sutureless Valve Implantation

ABSTRACT Introduction: Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) is related to increased circulating endothelial microparticles (EMP). Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the plasma concentration of EMP between patients undergoing aortic valve replacement with conventional bioprosthesis implantation and Perceval™ S (LivaNova) and to evaluate its impact on the inflammatory response in the short-term follow-up. Methods: This is a randomized clinical trial with 24 patients submitted to isolated aortic valve replacement divided into two groups: Perceval™ S (Group P) and conventional bioprostheses (Group C). Incidence of severe SIRS (three or more criteria) in the first 48 hours postoperatively, EMP release profile, interleukins (IL) 6 and 8, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin were analyzed preand postoperatively at 24 hours and three months. Results: There were 24 patients (12 in each group), mean age was 69.92±5.17 years, 83.33% were female, the incidence of severe SIRS was 66.7% and 50% in groups C and P, respectively (P=0.68), and EMP showed a significant increase in the 24-hour postoperative period (P≤0.001) and subsequent decrease in the three-month postoperative period (P≤0.001), returning to baseline levels. For IL-6 and IL-8, there was a greater increase in group C at 24 hours postoperatively (P=.0.02 and P<0.001). Conclusion: The incidence of severe SIRS was similar in both groups, with significantly higher levels of IL-6 and IL-8, at the 24-hour postoperative period, in group C, however with higher levels of EMP in group P, and subsequent return to baseline levels at the three-month postoperative period in both groups.

Manejo anestésico perioperatorio en histerectomía total abdominal por fibroma uterino en paciente con estenosis aórtica severa. Presentación de un caso

Se presenta el caso de una paciente de 35 años, femenina, con antecedentes de presentar un soplo desde la infancia y que debía ser intervenida quirúrgicamente por fibroma uterino. El anestesiólogo, durante la consulta preoperatoria, constató el soplo ya mencionado por lo que se decidió posponer la cirugía e interconsultar con un cardiólogo. El examen ecocardiográfico demostró que la paciente era portadora de una estenosis aórtica severa con fracción de eyección conservada, prueba ergométrica: clase funcional I, sin isquemia. Mediante anestesia general orotraqueal, se realizó histerectomía total abdominal sin complicaciones. Es de vital importancia para el anestesiólogo el manejo perioperatorio de la estenosis aórtica.

The case of a 35-years-old female patient with a history of presenting a murmur since childhood and who had to undergo surgery for uterine fibroid is presented. The anesthesiologist, during the preoperative consultation, verified the aforementioned murmur, so it was decided to postpone surgery and consult with a cardiologist. The echocardiographic examination showed that the patient had severe aortic stenosis with preserved ejection fraction, stress test: functional class I, without ischemia. Using orotracheal general anesthesia, a total abdominal hysterectomy was performed without complications. The perioperative management of aortic stenosis is of vital importance for the anesthesiologist.

Endarterectomía carotídea en paciente con estenosis aórtica crítica. Importancia de la anestesia regional y del neuromonitoreo / Carotid endarterectomy in a patient with critical aortic stenosis. Importance of regional anesthesia and transoperative neurological monitoring

Resumen: La estenosis carotídea (EC) ocurre en 13% de los pacientes con estenosis valvular aórtica (EVA). El riesgo de evento vascular cerebral (EVC), en los pacientes con EC significativa sometidos a cirugía valvular cardíaca, puede aumentar hasta 11%. Someter a un paciente con EVA crítica y fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (FEVI) disminuida a endarterectomía carotídea es todo un reto anestésico, cuyo principal objetivo es evitar la hipotensión y el bajo gasto cardíaco. La anestesia regional es una opción para estos pacientes. Presentamos el caso de un hombre de 70 años con diagnóstico de EC significativa y EVA crítica con disfunción ventricular izquierda, al que se realizó endarterectomía carotídea con bloqueo del plexo cervical superficial por alto riesgo de colapso circulatorio. Dicha estrategia anestésica permitió mantener al paciente despierto durante la cirugía, al valorar continuamente su estado neurológico. Asimismo, se documentaron los cambios transoperatorios en el NIRS (Near-infrared spectroscopy) cerebral y Doppler transcraneal (DTC), los cuales se correlacionaron con el estado clínico del paciente. En un segundo tiempo se hizo cambio valvular aórtico sin complicaciones. En este caso destaca la importancia de la anestesia regional y el monitoreo neurológico con Doppler transcraneal, en pacientes sometidos a endarterectomía carotídea con alto riesgo quirúrgico por EVA crítica.

Abstract: Carotid stenosis occurs in 13% of patients with aortic valve stenosis. The risk of stroke in patients with significant carotid stenosis undergoing heart valve surgery may increase to 11%. Proposing a patient with critical aortic valve stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction to carotid endarterectomy is an anesthetic challenge, where the objective is to avoid hypotension and low cardiac output. Regional anesthesia is an option for these patients. Due to the high incidence of intraoperative stroke during carotid endarterectomy, continuous neurological monitoring is of relevance. We present the case of a 70-year-old man diagnosed with significant carotid stenosis and critical aortic valve stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction who underwent carotid endarterectomy with superficial cervical plexus block due to a high risk of circulatory collapse. In addition, this anesthetic strategy made it possible to keep the patient awake during surgery, and to continuously assess their neurological status. Likewise, transoperative changes in brain NIRS and transcranial Doppler were documented, which correlated with the patient's clinical status. In a second time, aortic valve replacement was performed without complications. This case highlights the importance of regional anesthesia and neurological monitoring in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy with high surgical risk due to critical aortic valve stenosis.

Utilidad del NT-proBNP en la evaluación pronóstica de pacientes con estenosis aórtica grave asintomáticos, con fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda preservada / Prognostic Value of NT-proBNP in Asymptomatic Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

RESUMEN Introducción : La indicación de reemplazo valvular aórtico (RVA) en pacientes con estenosis aórtica (EA) grave asintomáticos con función conservada es motivo de creciente debate. Objetivos : Evaluar si la elevación de la fracción aminoterminal del pro-péptido natriurético tipo B (NT-proBNP) predice la aparición de síntomas y la indicación de reemplazo valvular en pacientes inicialmente asintomáticos, con EA grave y fracción de eyección ventricular izquierda (FEVI) conservada. Material y métodos : Se incluyeron en forma prospectiva pacientes con EA grave, FEVI conservada (≥55%) que fueron considerados asintomáticos, sin indicación inicial de RVA. A todos se les realizó laboratorio con medición de NT-proBNP en forma basal y ecocardiograma con Doppler tisular consignando la onda S de la pared lateral (S lat) y la relación E/e´. Se consideró como punto final el requerimiento de reemplazo valvular durante el seguimiento. Resultados : Se incluyeron 133 pacientes con una edad de 69 ± 8 años, 49% mujeres. Luego de un seguimiento de 570 (rango intercuartilo 380-680) días, el 23,3% (n = 31) de los pacientes presentaron requerimiento de reemplazo valvular. En el aná lisis multivariado, el NT-proBNP y la relación E/e´ fueron predictores independientes de requerimiento de cirugía (HR 1,02, IC95% 1,001-1,03, p <0,001; y HR 1,42, IC95% 1,21-2,45, p<0,001, respectivamente). El NT-proBNP presentó un Área Bajo la Curva (ABC) mayor que la relación E/e´ (0,88 versus 0,64, p = 0,02). Se estableció como mejor punto de corte de NT-proBNP un valor >350 pg./mL (HR ajustado 1,55, IC95% 1,38-2,01, p <0,001). Conclusiones : El NT-proBNP y la relación E/e´ fueron predictores independientes de requerimiento de cirugía. El NT-proBNP presentó una muy buena capacidad de discriminación, mayor que la relación E/e´.

ABSTRACT Background : The aortic valve replacement (AVR) indication in asymptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and preserved function is being increasingly discussed. Objective : The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the elevation of the N-terminal fraction of the pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) predicts the occurrence of symptoms and the AVR indication in patients with severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), initially asymptomatic. Methods : Asymptomatic patients with severe AS, preserved EF (≥55%) and no initial AVR indication were prospectively included. All patients underwent laboratory tests measuring NT-proBNP at baseline and an echocardiogram with tissue Doppler recording the lateral wall S wave (lat. S) and the E/e´ ratio. The endpoint was the aortic valve replacement indication at follow-up. Results : We included 133 patients aged 69 ± 8 years, 49% of which were women. After a follow-up of 570 (interquartile range 380-680) days, 23.3% (n=31) of them required aortic valve replacement. In the multivariate analysis, NT-proBNP value and the E/e´ ratio were 2 independent predictors of surgery (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.001-1.03) p<0.001 and HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.21- 2.45, p< 0.001, respectively). NT-proBNP presented an area under the curve (AUC) greater than the E/e' ratio (0.88 versus 0.64, p=0.02). The best NT-proBNP cut-off point was determined >350 pg/mL (adjusted HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.38-2.01, p<0.001) Conclusion : NT-proBNP value and the E/e´ ratio were independent predictors of the AVR requirement. NT-proBNP had a very good discrimination capacity, greater than the E/e´ ratio.

Prevalência de regurgitação paravalvar após implante transcateter de válvula aórtica / Prevalence of paravalve regurgitation after aortic valve transcatheter implantation

Introdução: Com o envelhecimento populacional brasileiro, esperase que a incidência de doenças cardiovasculares, como a estenose e insuficiência da válvula aórtica, eleve-se. Desde 2002, o implante valvar aórtico transcateter demonstrou-se método de alta eficácia no seu tratamento. No entanto, o procedimento está sujeito ao regurgitamento paravalvar. Objetivo: Avaliar quantitativamente a prevalência dessa regurgitação em pacientes submetidos ao Implante valvar aórtico transcateter. Métodos: Estudo observacional, transversal, retrospectivo que analisou 38 casos de Implante valvar aórtico transcateter. Os dados foram coletados dos prontuários, que incluíram informações antropométricas, comorbidades e procedimentos prévios à operação, e analisou-se a presença de refluxo paravalvar no 1° mês e 1° ano pós-Implante valvar aórtico transcateter. Resultados: A idade média foi de 74 ±11,2 anos; 15 pacientes dos analisados, possuíam classificação NYHA igual a III, e 1 NYHA IV, previamente à operação. Do total, 36,32% (n=8) tinham refluxo paravalvar no 1° mês e 1º. ano após o procedimento cirúrgico. Conclusão: A prevalência de refluxo paravalvar pós-operatório em pacientes submetidos ao Implante valvar aórtico transcateter, foi igual a 36,3% tanto para a avaliação realizada no 1° mês quanto no 1° ano.

Introduction: With the aging of the Brazilian population, it is expected that the incidence of cardiovascular diseases, such as stenosis and insufficiency of the aortic valve, will increase. Since 2002, transcatheter aortic valve implantation has proved to be a highly effective method of treatment. However, the procedure is subject to paravalvular regurgitation. Objective: To quantitatively assess the prevalence of paravalvular regurgitation in patients undergoing Transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods: Observational, cross-sectional, retrospective study that analyzed 38 Transcatheter aortic valve implantation cases. Data were collected from medical records, which included anthropometric information, comorbidities and procedures prior to the operation, and the presence of paravalvular regurgitation in the 1st month and 1st year after Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was analyzed. Results: Mean age was 74 ±11.2 years; 15 of the analyzed patients had NYHA classification equal to III, and 1 NYHA IV, prior to the operation. Of the total, 36.32% (n=8) of the patients had paravalvular regurgitation in the 1st and 1st month. year after the surgical procedure. Conclusion: The prevalence of postoperative paravalvular regurgitation in patients undergoing Transcatheter aortic valve implantation was equal to 36.3% both for the assessment carried out in the 1st month and in the 1st year

A Systematic Review of Benefits and Risks of Fetal Surgery for Congenital Cardiac Defects Such as Pulmonary Valve Stenosis and Critical Aortic Stenosis

ABSTRACT Introduction: Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) constitute the most prevalent congenital pathology, and they are a consequence of structural and functional abnormalities during fetal development. The etiology of CHD involves the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. Fetal cardiac surgery aims at preventing natural pathways of CHD in utero, mitigating progression to more complex abnormalities. The goal of this review was to demonstrate the benefits and risks of fetal interventions in the two most prevalent CHDs, pulmonary stenosis and pulmonary atresia with an intact ventricular septum, but also critical aortic stenosis and hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Methods: Original and relevant articles were selected by meta-aggregation to perform a qualitative analysis of fetal cardiac interventions for pulmonary stenosis and critical aortic stenosis. The Joanna Briggs Institute's Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (or JBI-QARI) was used for data quality appraisal. Results: Of 61 potential articles, 13 were selected, and nine were finally included. Discussion: The present review demonstrated that fetal cardiac surgery increases right ventricular growth and hemodynamic flow in pulmonary stenosis, whereas in critical aortic stenosis it enables growth of the left ventricle and increases left ventricular pressure. However, it has a high complication rate, along with considerable morbidity and mortality. Conclusion: The benefits of fetal cardiac surgery for pulmonary stenosis and critical aortic stenosis are well-described in the literature; however, there is a significant risk of complications which can be reduced by the surgeon's technical expertise and well-structured hospital facilities.

Proposed Risk Score in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Submitted to Valve Replacement Surgery

ABSTRACT Introduction: Due to Brazilian population aging, prevalence of aortic stenosis, and limited number of scores in literature, it is essential to develop risk scores adapted to our reality and created in the specific context of this disease. Methods: This is an observational historical cohort study with analysis of 802 aortic stenosis patients who underwent valve replacement at Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, from 1996 to 2018. With the aid of logistic regression, a weighted risk score was constructed based on the magnitude of the coeficients β of the logistic equation. Two performance statistics were obtained: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the chi-square (χ2) of Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit with Pearson's correlation coeficient between the observed events and predicted as a model calibration estimate. Results: The risk predictors that composed the score were valve replacement surgery combined with coronary artery bypass grafting, prior renal failure, New York Heart Association class III/IV heart failure, age > 70 years, and ejection fraction < 50%. The receiver operating characteristic curve area was 0.77 (95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.82); regarding the model calibration estimated between observed/predicted mortality, Hosmer-Lemeshow test χ2 = 3,70 (P=0.594) and Pearson's coeficient r = 0.98 (P<0.001). Conclusion: We propose the creation of a simple score, adapted to the Brazilian reality, with good performance and which can be validated in other institutions.

Reparo valvar percutâneo borda a borda da insuficiência mitral após implante transcateter de válvula aórtica / Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral regurgitation valve repair after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

A insuficiência mitral moderada a grave é observada em 17 a 35% dos pacientes submetidos a implante transcateter de válvula aórtica. Estudo que reporta a insuficiência mitral pós- realização de implante transcateter de válvula aórtica por estenose aórtica demonstra que 50% dos pacientes com refluxo moderado a grave apresentaram melhora da regurgitação, e 8,7% evidenciam piora do quadro. Nesses pacientes com piora, houve aumento da mortalidade. Essa progressão sugere que condutas convencionais, baseadas em otimização medicamentosa, podem não ser capazes de prevenir quadros negativos. Relatamos um caso sobre a evolução da insuficiência mitral após implante transcateter de válvula aórtica e o uso do MitraClip® como alternativa de tratamento e benefícios.

Moderate to severe mitral regurgitation is observed in 17 to 35% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. A study reporting mitral regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation due to aortic stenosis demontrated 50% of patients with moderate to severe reflux showed improvement in regurgitation, and 8.7% showed worsening of the condition, which led to increased mortality. This progression suggested conventional management, based on medication optimization, may not be able to prevent poor outcomes. We report a case on the clinical course of a patient with mitral regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, and the use of MitraClip® as an alternative treatment and its benefits.

Insuficiência Tricúspide e Mortalidade em Pacientes Submetidos à Troca da Valva Aórtica Transcateter: Uma Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise / Tricuspid Regurgitation and Mortality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Resumo Fundamento A extensão do dano cardíaco associada à estenose aórtica tem importantes implicações prognósticas após a substituição da valva aórtica transcateter (TAVR). Contudo, ainda não está claro qual é o papel da insuficiência tricúspide (IT) nesse cenário clínico. Objetivos Explorar a associação entre IT e mortalidade em pacientes submetidos a TAVR e avaliar as alterações na gravidade da IT após a TAVR e sua relação com mortalidade de curto e médio prazo. Métodos Foram feitas pesquisas em bases de dados relevantes de artigos publicados do início até agosto de 2020. Dos 414 estudos triados, selecionamos 24 que relataram o grau de IT pré- ou pós-TAVR. O desfecho primário foi mortalidade por todas as causas, e foram conduzidos modelos de metanálise de efeitos aleatórios (a um nível de significância de 5%). Resultados Dezessete estudos relataram associações entre IT pré-TAVR e mortalidade por todas as causas (> 45.000 participantes), e 13 avaliaram a gravidade da IT pós-TAVR (709 participantes). A IT basal moderada/grave foi associada a maior mortalidade por todas as causas em 30 dias [razão de risco (RR) 1,65; intervalo de confiança (IC) 95% 1,20-2,29] e 1,2 ano (RR 1,56; IC95% 1,31-1,84). Após a TAVR, 43% dos pacientes apresentaram redução de pelo menos um grau na IT (30 dias, IC95% 30-56%), que se sustentou em 12,5 meses em 44% dos participantes (IC95% 35-52%).A persistência de IT significativa foi associada a um aumento de duas vezes na mortalidade por todas as causas (RR 2,12; IC95% 1,53-2,92). Conclusões A IT significativa pré-TAVR está associada a maior mortalidade. Ainda que a gravidade da IT possa melhorar, a persistência de IT significativa após a TAVR está fortemente associada ao aumento da mortalidade. Nossos achados destacam a importância de uma avaliação detalhada da IT pré- e pós-TAVR e podem ajudar a identificar pacientes que possam se beneficiar de uma vigilância mais cuidadosa nesse cenário.

Abstract Background The extent of cardiac damage associated with aortic stenosis has important prognostic implications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, the role of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) in this clinical setting is still unclear. Objectives To explore the association between TR and mortality in patients undergoing TAVR and assess changes in TR severity post TAVR and its relationship with short and mid-term mortality. Methods Relevant databases were searched for articles published from inception until August 2020. Out of 414 screened studies, we selected 24 that reported the degree of TR pre or post TAVR. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and random effects meta-analysis models were conducted (at a significance level of 5%). Results Seventeen studies reported associations between pre-TAVR TR and all-cause mortality (> 45,000 participants) and thirteen accessed TR severity post TAVR (709 participants). Moderate/severe baseline TR was associated to higher all-cause mortality both at 30 days (HR 1.65; 95% CI, 1.20-2.29) and 1.2 years (HR 1.56; 95% CI, 1.31-1.84). After TAVR, 43% of patients presented a decrease of at least one grade in TR (30 days, 95% CI, 30-56%), sustained at 12.5 months in 44% of participants (95% CI, 35-52%). Persistence of significant TR was associated with a two-fold increase in all-cause mortality (HR 2.12; 95% CI, 1.53-2.92). Conclusions Significant TR pre TAVR is associated with higher mortality. Although TR severity may improve, the persistence of significant TR post TAVR is strongly associated with increased mortality. Our findings highlight the importance of a detailed assessment of TR pre and post TAVR and might help identify patients who may benefit from more careful surveillance in this scenario.

Research progress of application of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the bicuspid aortic valve stenosis / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#Patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) are characterized by asymmetric anatomy, severe calcification and combined aortic dilatation. Compared with tricuspid aortic valve stenosis patients, patients with BAV stenosis confront with greater surgical risks in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), including paravalvular leak, aortic valve rupture, coronary artery obstruction, atrioventricular block and so on. However, with the advent of new generation of prosthetic valves and optimization of surgical strategies, several studies have shown that TAVR is safe and effective in the treatment of BAV stenosis. Therefore, we aim to provide an overview of the use of TAVR in patients with BAV stenosis.

Progress of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with atrioventricular regurgitation / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#As the indications for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) expand, multi-valve lesions are becoming more common in clinical practice. Moderate to severe atrioventricular regurgitation, particularly when persistent after TAVR, significantly increases the risk of adverse events. Therefore, many studies have evaluated factors that contribute to the improvement of atrioventricular regurgitation. However, this field remains controversial due to the heterogeneity of retrospective studies and the lack of randomized controlled trials. Despite advances in atrioventricular valve intervention techniques, evidence for atrioventricular regurgitation intervention after TAVR is still scarce. The management decision for atrioventricular regurgitation in patients who underwent TAVR is complex and must take into account the severity of valve disease, anatomical characteristics, quality of life, and procedural complexity. We conducted a review of atrioventricular regurgitation in patients who have received TAVR in hope that it will help decision-making in clinical practice.

Perfil clínico e hemodinâmico de pacientes consecutivos com estenose aórtica valvar estudados na era pré-implante transcateter valvar aórtico em instituição acadêmica. Análise comparativa da avaliação invasiva com a ecocardiográfica / Clinical and hemodynamic profile of consecutive patients with aortic valve stenosis studied in the pre-transcatheter aortic valve implantation era at an academic institution. Comparative analysis of invasive evaluation with echocardiography

Introdução: Face à melhor compreensão da fisiopatologia da estenose valvar aórtica, cresceu paralelamente a complexidade da avaliação de sua gravidade, persistindo relevante incerteza quanto à aplicabilidade dos métodos invasivos pelo cateterismo cardíaco e os não invasivos, com base em ecocardiografia. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar os padrões hemodinâmicos da avaliação com ecocardiografia comparativamente à estimativa da gravidade da estenose aórtica com o cateterismo em pacientes consecutivos referidos para avaliação diagnóstica por laboratório de hospital acadêmico terciário no triênio 2016-2018. Métodos: Estudo observacional, descritivo e retrospectivo das características clínicas e dos resultados das avaliações da gravidade da estenose valvar aórtica obtidas em 96 pacientes consecutivos, por meio de cateterismo e ecocardiografia. Resultados: Amostra populacional de 49 homens e 47 mulheres, com mediana de idade de 66,5 (56,5 a 72,8) anos, estenose valvar aórtica degenerativa em 49% e reumática em 40%, além de diversas comorbidades, inclusive doença coronária (37%). Pelo cateterismo, com base no gradiente pico de 48 (20 a 68), a estenose valvar aórtica foi avaliada como grave em 56%, sendo a pressão telediastólica ventricular de 20mmHg (16 a 30mmHg). Pela ecocardiografia, a área valvar foi 0,9cm2 (0,7 a 1,2cm2), sendo indexado 0,5cm2/m2 (0,43 a 0,5cm2/m2), com gradiente pico de 62±26 mmHg. A estenose valvar aórtica foi considerada severa em 69,2%. Houve discordância entre os métodos sobre a severidade da estenose valvar aórtica em 30% dos exames, com coeficiente de Spearman entre área valvar pelo ecocardiograma e gradiente pico pelo cateterismo de -0,7 (p<0,001). Conclusão: Em amostra representativa dos vários padrões hemodinâmicos, a avaliação da gravidade da estenose valvar aórtica, como praticada rotineiramente em laboratório acadêmico, limitou-se à medida de pico de gradiente transvalvar. A estimativa da área valvar pelo método ecocardiográfico, sendo indireta e também passível de crítica, contribui para as discrepâncias encontradas, tornando-se justificável buscar o aperfeiçoamento de ambos os métodos, em vista da complexidade clínica e hemodinâmica detectada.

Background: In view of the better understanding of the pathophysiology of aortic valve stenosis, the complexity of assessing its severity has simultaneously grown, with relevant uncertainty persisting as to the applicability of invasive methods by cardiac catheterization and non-invasive methods based on echocardiography. The objective of this study was to analyze the hemodynamic patterns of evaluation with echocardiography compared to the estimation of severity of aortic stenosis with catheterization in consecutive patients referred for diagnostic evaluation by the laboratory of a tertiary academic hospital in the 2016 to 2018 triennium. Methods: An observational, descriptive and retrospective study of clinical characteristics and results of assessments of severity of aortic valve stenosis obtained in 96 consecutive patients, through catheterization and echocardiography. Results: A population sample of 49 men and 47 women, with a median age of 66.5 (56.5 to 72.8) years, degenerative aortic valve stenosis in 49%, and rheumatic aortic stenosis in 40%, in addition to several comorbidities, including coronary disease (37%). Using catheterization, based on the peak gradient of 48 (20 to 68), aortic valve stenosis was assessed as severe in 56%, with ventricular end-diastolic pressure of 20mmHg (16 to 30mmHg). Using echocardiography, the valve area was 0.9cm2 (0.7 to 1.2cm2), indexed valve area was 0.5cm2/m2 (0.43 to 0.5cm2/m2), with peak gradient of 62±26mmHg. Aortic valve stenosis was considered severe in 69.2%. There was disagreement between the methods regarding severity of aortic valve stenosis in 30% of exams, with a Spearman coefficient between the valve area on the echocardiogram and the peak gradient on catheterization of -0.7 (p<0.001). Conclusion: In a representative sample of various hemodynamic patterns, the assessment of severity of aortic valve stenosis, as routinely practiced in an academic laboratory, was limited to measuring the peak transvalvular gradient. The estimation of the valve area using the echocardiographic method was indirect and also subject to criticism, and contributed to the discrepancies found, rendering it justifiable to seek the improvement of both methods, in view of the clinical and hemodynamic complexity detected.

Implante Valvar Transcateter em Pacientes com Estenose Valvar Aórtica: Uma Overview de Revisões Sistemáticas e Metanálise Incluindo Múltiplas Populações / Transcatheter Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Valve Stenosis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis with Different Populations

Resumo Fundamento Ensaios clínicos randomizados (ECRs) e estudos observacionais compararam a eficácia e a segurança do implante valvar transcateter (TAVR) e da substituição cirúrgica da valva aórtica (SAVR) em pacientes com estenose aórtica grave. Objetivos Comparar TAVR e SAVR em pacientes com diferentes riscos cirúrgicos, características da população e diferentes válvulas protéticas transcateter. Métodos Uma overview das revisões sistemáticas (RSs) foi realizada seguindo um protocolo estruturado. Os resultados foram agrupados por risco cirúrgico, características da população e diferentes válvulas. Os ECRs foram reanalisados por meio de metanálises nas RSs, e os resultados foram resumidos por meio do método GRADE. O nível de significância estatística adotado foi de 5%. Resultados Em comparação com a SAVR, os pacientes com alto risco cirúrgico submetidos à TAVR tiveram um risco menor de ( odds ratio , intervalo de confiança de 95%, diferença absoluta de risco) fibrilação atrial (FA) (0,5, 0,29-0,86, -106/1000) e hemorragia com risco à vida (0,29, 0,2-0,42, -215/1000). Pacientes com risco cirúrgico intermediário apresentaram menor risco de FA (0,27, 0,23-0,33, -255/1.000), hemorragia com risco à vida (0,15, 0,12-0,19, -330/1.000) e insuficiência renal aguda (IRA) (0,4, 0,26-0,62, -21/1000). Pacientes com baixo risco cirúrgico tiveram menor risco de morte (0,58, 0,34-0,97, -16/1000), acidente vascular encefálico (AVE) (0,51, 0,28-0,94, -15/1000), FA (0,16, 0,12-0,2, -295/1000), hemorragia com risco à vida (0,17, 0,05-0,55, -76/1000) e IRA (0,27, 0,13-0,55, -21/1000) e tiveram maior risco de implante de marca-passo definitivo (IMD) (4,22, 1,27 -14.02, 141/1000). Os dispositivos de geração mais recente tiveram um risco menor de FA em comparação com as gerações mais antigas, e pacientes usuários de dispositivos expansíveis por balão não apresentaram riscos maiores de IMD. Conclusões Este artigo apresenta evidências de que pacientes com risco cirúrgico baixo, intermediário e alto apresentam melhores desfechos quando tratados com TAVR em comparação com a SAVR.

Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies have compared the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Objectives Compare TAVR and SAVR in patients with different surgical risks, population characteristics, and different transcatheter prosthetic valves. Methods An overview of systematic reviews (SRs) was conducted following a structured protocol. Results were grouped by surgical risk, population characteristics, and different valves. RCTs in the SRs were reanalyzed through meta-analyses, and the results were summarized using the GRADE method. The adopted level of statistical significance was 5%. Results Compared to SAVR, patients with high surgical risk using TAVR had a lower risk of (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval, absolute risk difference) atrial fibrillation (AF) (0.5, 0.29-0.86, -106/1000) and life-threatening bleeding (0.29, 0.2-0.42, -215/1000). Patients with intermediate surgical risk had a lower risk of AF (0.27, 0.23-0.33, -255/1000), life-threatening bleeding (0.15, 0.12-0.19, -330/1000), and acute renal failure (ARF) (0.4, 0.26-0.62, -21/1000). Patients with low surgical risk had a lower risk of death (0.58, 0.34-0.97, -16/1000), stroke (0.51, 0.28-0.94, -15/1000), AF (0.16, 0.12-0.2, -295/1000), life-threatening bleeding (0.17, 0.05-0.55, -76/1000), and ARF (0.27, 0.13-0.55, -21/1000), and had a higher risk of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) (4.22, 1.27-14.02, 141/1000). Newer generation devices had a lower risk of AF than older generations, and patients using balloon-expandable devices did not experience higher risks of PPI. Conclusions This paper provides evidence that patients at low, intermediate, and high surgical risks have better outcomes when treated with TAVR compared with SAVR.

Degenerative Aortic Stenosis in Women: Challenges and Perspectives

Abstract Degenerative aortic stenosis is currently a public health problem. Affecting the elderly population, this pathology has been showing an increasing prevalence as a direct result of the population aging. In this context, women have a greater life expectancy, corresponding to most of the population with degenerative aortic stenosis. Specific characteristics of this pathology in females are present in the diagnosis, pathophysiology, anatomical aspects, imaging and in therapeutic approach. Women present a more severe disease with less valve calcification than men, more concentric ventricular remodeling, higher transvalvular gradients, and less myocardial fibrosis. Less evident symptoms mean that these patients are referred later for surgical or percutaneous therapeutic treatment. The greater comorbidity presented by females and possibly due to the smaller body surface, bring specific aspects that affect the surgery results, leading to higher mortality rates and, more often, the prosthesis-patient mismatch. Percutaneous valve implantation is a good alternative, with better results in females, when compared to surgery, both in the treatment of native valves and in the treatment of a previously implanted bioprosthesis' dysfunction. The challenges encountered for the treatment of aortic stenosis in women and their possible solutions are described in this article, focusing on the observed difference of aortic stenosis in females and their possible solutions.

Resultados del implante percutáneo de válvula aórtica (TAVI). Experiencia después de la primera década desde la introducción de la técnica / Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation. A ten years clinical experience

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) was introduced in 2002 and the first implants in our country were performed in 2010. AIM: To review the TAVI experience in our hospital, considering the technology improvements and gained experience throughout this period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients undergoing TAVI in our center were included. Results and complications were adjudicated according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 (VARC-2) criteria. Patients were divided in 3 groups, according to procedural year: Period 1: 2010-2015 (n = 35); Period 2: 2016-2018 (n = 35); Period 3: 2019-2021 (n = 41). Mortality up to one year after the procedure was recorded. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2021, 111 TAVI procedures were performed. The mean age of patients was 82 years and 47% were women. Risk scores for in-hospital mortality were STS 6.7%, EUROSCORE II 8.0% and ACC/STS TAVR Score 4.9%. The trans-femoral route was used in 88% and a balloon-expandable valve was chosen in 82% of patients. A successful implant was achieved in 96%, with an in-hospital mortality of 1.8%. Mortality at 30 days and 1-year were 2.7 and 9.0%, respectively. During period 3, 100% of implants were successful, with no in-hospital mortality, less vascular complications (p < 0.01), less stroke (p = 0.04), less severe paravalvular leak (p = 0.01) and significantly lower rate of acute complications (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: TAVI achieves excellent results. With greater experience and better available technologies, these results are even more favorable.

Computed tomography angiography in the planning of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a step-by-step approach / Angiotomografia computadorizada no planejamento de substituição transcateter da válvula aórtica: uma abordagem passo a passo

Abstract Aortic valve stenosis is the most common acquired valvular heart disease. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation, also known as transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), is an important treatment option for symptomatic aortic stenosis in patients at any level of surgical risk. The role of computed tomography angiography (CTA) has expanded considerably in recent years, and it has now become the imaging method of choice for the planning of TAVR. Therefore, radiologists should understand the main aspects of this imaging modality, including the appropriate technique and protocol to acquire reliable CTA images and to create a useful radiology report. The aim of this study was to review the most important aspects of CTA for TAVR planning.

Resumo A estenose da válvula aórtica é a doença cardíaca valvar adquirida mais comum. A substituição transcateter da válvula aórtica (TAVR), ou implante transcateter da válvula aórtica, é uma importante opção no tratamento da estenose aórtica sintomática, independente do risco cirúrgico do paciente. O papel da angiotomografia computadorizada cresceu consideravelmente nos últimos anos e tornou-se o método de escolha no planejamento de TAVR. Assim, o radiologista deve compreender os principais aspectos dessa modalidade, incluindo técnica e protocolo, a fim de adquirir imagens confiáveis e compor um relatório para a realização do procedimento. O objetivo deste ensaio é revisar os pontos mais importantes que precisam ser avaliados na angiotomografia no planejamento de TAVR.

Dependência de Pacing a Longo-Prazo e Preditores de Implante de Pacemaker após Implante Percutâneo de Prótese Valvular Aórtica - 1 Ano de Seguimento / Long-Term Ventricular Pacing Dependency and Pacemaker Implantation Predictors after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - A 1-Year Follow-Up

Resumo Fundamento Os distúrbios de condução (DC) são a complicação mais frequente após a substituição da válvula aórtica transcateter (TAVR) e ainda não há consenso sobre seu tratamento. Objetivo Avaliar novos DC e implante de marca-passo definitivo (MPD) após a TAVR e avaliar a porcentagem de estimulação ventricular (EV) até 1 ano de acompanhamento. Métodos Pacientes submetidos a TAVR de outubro de 2014 a novembro de 2019 foram cadastrados; pacientes com MPD anterior foram excluídos. Dados clínicos, do procedimento, do ECG e do MPD foram coletados até 1 ano após o implante. O nível de significância adotado para a análise estatística foi 0,05%. Resultados Um total de 340 indivíduos foram submetidos a TAVR. O DC mais comum foi bloqueio de ramo esquerdo novo (BRE; 32,2%), sendo que 56% destes foram resolvidos após 6 meses. O bloqueio do ramo direito (BRD) foi o maior fator de risco para bloqueio atrioventricular avançado (BAV) [RC=8,46; p<0,001] e implante de MPD [RC=5,18; p<0,001], seguido de BAV de baixo grau prévio [RC=2,25; p=0,016 para implante de MPD]. Em relação às características do procedimento, válvulas de gerações mais recentes e procedimentos de válvula-em-válvula foram associados a menos DC. No total, 18,5% dos pacientes tiveram MPD implantado após a TAVR. Na primeira avaliação do MPD, pacientes com BAV avançado tinham uma porcentagem mediana de EV de 80%, e, após um ano, de 83%. Em relação aos pacientes com BRE e BAV de baixo grau, a EV mediana foi mais baixa (6% na primeira avaliação, p=0,036; 2% após um ano, p = 0,065). Conclusão O BRE foi o DC mais frequente após a TAVR, com mais da metade dos casos se resolvendo nos primeiros 6 meses. O BRD foi o principal fator de risco para BAV avançado e implante de MPD. O BAV avançado foi associado a uma porcentagem mais alta de EV no acompanhamento de 1 ano.

Abstract Background Conduction disturbances (CD) are the most frequent complication after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and there continues to be a lack of consensus on their management. Objective To assess new CD and permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation after TAVR and to evaluate the ventricular pacing percentage (VP) up to 1 year of follow-up. Methods Patients who underwent TAVR from October 2014 to November 2019 were enrolled; patients with previous PPM were excluded. Clinical, procedure, ECG, and PPM data were collected up to 1 year after implantation. The significance level adopted in the statistical analysis was 0.05. Results A total of 340 patients underwent TAVR. The most frequent CD was the new left bundle branch block (LBBB; 32.2%), which 56% resolved after 6 months. Right bundle branch block (RBBB) was the biggest risk factor for advanced atrioventricular block (AVB) [OR=8.46; p<0.001] and PPM implantation [OR=5.18, p<0.001], followed by previous low-grade AVB [OR=2.25; p=0.016 for PPM implantation]. Regarding procedure characteristics, newer generation valves and valve-in-valve procedures were associated with fewer CDs. Overall, 18.5% of patients had a PPM implanted post-TAVR. At first PPM evaluation, patients with advanced AVB had a median percentage of VP of 80% and 83% at one year. Regarding patients with LBBB plus low-grade AVB, median VP was lower (6% at first assessment, p=0.036; 2% at one year, p = 0.065). Conclusion LBBB was the most frequent CD after TAVR, with more than half being resolved in the first six months. RBBB was the major risk factor for advanced AVB and PPM implantation. Advanced AVB was associated with a higher percentage of VP at 1 year of follow-up.